![]() ![]() We tested each cutting method using the quantities and cut lengths in the table below. The goal of the experiment was to determine which cutting method results in the least amount of wasted material - specifically, the lowest number of stock lengths. The program will mix and match cut sizes as appropriate to ensure the least amount of material is used. Full lengths are used if there are no drops left and more small parts need to be cut.Ĭut optimization programs use an algorithm to calculate the most efficient cutting order based on input cut lengths and quantities. Fabricators using this method cut longer lengths first then go back to cut smaller pieces from the drops until there are none left. This method is used more often than the first and is widely believed to be more efficient (we’ll test this to find out for sure). This method is simple to implement but not usually very efficient. Fabricators using this method focus on maximizing cutting speed but tend to use full-length stocks instead of drops for each cut. When using this method, you simply go down the list of required parts and cut each set of like sizes in sequence. ![]() We compared three methods used by fabrication shops to cut stock lengths (typically 24’ long) into the desired lengths for construction: We set up an experiment to find out, and figure out exactly how much material a length cut optimizer can save you compared to other common cutting methods. ![]() The purpose of a cut optimizer is to reduce material waste, speed up the fabrication process, and increase overall profits. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |